Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Abstract— In nature, many animals are able to jump, upright themselves,after landing,and,jump,again. This allows,them to move,in unstructured,and,rough,terrain. As a further development of our previously presented 7g jumping robot, we consider,various mechanisms,enabling,it to recover and upright after landing,and,jump,again. After a weighted,evaluation,of these different solutions, we present a spherical system with a mass of 9.8g and a diameter of 12cm that is able to jump, upright,itself after landing,and,jump,again. In order,to do so autonomously, it has a control unit and sensors to detect its orientation,and,spring,charging,state. With,its current configuration,it can,overcome,obstacles,of 76cm at a take-off angle of 75,. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354359 | St. Louis, MO |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
weighted evaluation,self-recovery capability,different solution,current configuration,various mechanism,spherical system,rough terrain,take-off angle,control unit,leg,robots,carbon,robustness,sensors,mobile robots,motion control,sensor,data mining | Jumping robot,Motion control,Computer science,Control theory,Simulation,Terrain,Robustness (computer science),Control engineering,Control unit,Jump,Robot,Mobile robot | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4244-3804-4 | 16 | 1.77 |
References | Authors | |
7 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Mirko Kovac | 1 | 103 | 14.43 |
Manuel Schlegel | 2 | 29 | 3.09 |
Jean-Christophe Zufferey | 3 | 467 | 46.55 |
Dario Floreano | 4 | 3400 | 284.98 |