Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Competency Questions(CQs) play an important role in the ontology development lifecycle, as they represent the ontology requirements. Although the main methodologies describe and use CQs, the current practice of ontology engineering makes a superficial use of CQs. One of the main problems that hamper their proper use lies on the lack of tools that assist users to check if CQs are being fulfilled by the ontology being defined, particularly when these ontologies are defined in OWL (Ontology Web Language), under the Description Logic formalism. We propose a mechanism to support evaluating whether the ontology follows their correspondent CQs. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1109/WI-IAT.2013.199 | Web Intelligence/IAT Workshops |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
competency questions,ontology engineering,main methodology,ontology requirement,correspondent cqs,proper use,main problem,superficial use,use cqs,ontology development lifecycle,description logic,ontology,formal verification | Ontology (information science),Ontology engineering,Ontology-based data integration,Process ontology,Software engineering,Open Biomedical Ontologies,Computer science,Ontology chart,Knowledge management,Suggested Upper Merged Ontology,Upper ontology | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
10 | 0.61 | 5 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Bezerra | 1 | 17 | 1.55 |
| Fred Freitas | 2 | 165 | 26.83 |
| Filipe Santana | 3 | 16 | 2.10 |