Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Non-rigid 3D shape retrieval has become an active and important research topic in content-based 3D object retrieval. The aim of this paper is to measure and compare the performance of state-of-the-art methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. The paper develops a new benchmark consisting of 600 non-rigid 3D watertight meshes, which are equally classified into 30 categories, to carry out experiments for 11 different algorithms, whose retrieval accuracies are evaluated using six commonly utilized measures. Models and evaluation tools of the new benchmark are publicly available on our web site [1]. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014 | Pattern Recognition |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
different algorithm,retrieval accuracy,object retrieval,watertight mesh,important research topic,shape retrieval,evaluation tool,utilized measure,new benchmark,state-of-the-art method,benchmark | Polygon mesh,Information retrieval,Computer science,Artificial intelligence,Machine learning,Web site | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
46 | 1 | 0031-3203 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
75 | 1.54 | 45 |
Authors | ||
19 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Zhou-hui Lian | 1 | 475 | 32.27 |
Afzal Godil | 2 | 619 | 30.70 |
Benjamin Bustos | 3 | 1356 | 67.78 |
Mohamed Daoudi | 4 | 1489 | 86.39 |
Jeroen Hermans | 5 | 184 | 9.00 |
Shun Kawamura | 6 | 78 | 1.95 |
Yukinori Kurita | 7 | 75 | 2.22 |
Guillaume Lavoué | 8 | 698 | 34.52 |
Hien V. Nguyen | 9 | 849 | 77.92 |
R. Ohbuchi | 10 | 1710 | 170.54 |
Yuki Ohkita | 11 | 87 | 2.05 |
Yuya Ohishi | 12 | 87 | 2.05 |
Fatih Porikli | 13 | 3409 | 169.13 |
Martin Reuter | 14 | 624 | 22.10 |
Ivan Sipiran | 15 | 398 | 17.19 |
Dirk Smeets | 16 | 413 | 16.61 |
Paul Suetens | 17 | 2811 | 431.53 |
Hedi Tabia | 18 | 278 | 16.27 |
Dirk Vandermeulen | 19 | 2419 | 356.13 |