Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We show that a meticulous design can encourage students in dyads to shift from informal reasoning (visual, inquiry-based) to reasoning moved by logical necessity (abductive and deductive). We describe a case study in which one dyad solves a series activities purposely designed. We show that argumentation first relies on intuition, and then intertwines the activities of conjecturing and checking the conjectures though the use of different gestures. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2010 | ICLS | argumentative design,series activity,informal reasoning,case study,meticulous design,different gesture,logical necessity |
Field | DocType | Citations |
Informal logic,Logical truth,Argumentative,Cognitive science,Visualization,Gesture,Argumentation theory,Intuition,Artificial intelligence,Dyad,Mathematics | Conference | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Prusak | 1 | 4 | 1.43 |
| Rina Hershkowitz | 2 | 0 | 1.01 |
| Baruch B. Schwarz | 3 | 190 | 20.36 |