Title | ||
---|---|---|
Effective top-k computation in retrieving structured documents with term-proximity support |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Modern web search engines are expected to return top-k results efficiently given a query. Although many dynamic index pruning strategies have been proposed for efficient top-k computation, most of them are prone to ignore some especially important factors in ranking functions, e.g. term proximity (the distance relationship between query terms in a document). The inclusion of term proximity breaks the monotonicity of ranking functions and therefore leads to additional challenges for efficient query processing. This paper studies the performance of some existing top-k computation approaches using term-proximity-enabled ranking functions. Our investigation demonstrates that, when term proximity is incorporated into ranking functions, most existing index structures and top-k strategies become quite inefficient. According to our analysis and experimental results, we propose two index structures and their corresponding index pruning strategies: Structured and Hybrid, which performs much better on the new settings. Moreover, the efficiency of index building and maintenance would not be affected too much with the two approaches. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1145/1321440.1321547 | CIKM |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
structured document,term-proximity-enabled ranking function,effective top-k computation,index structure,existing top-k computation,ranking function,dynamic index pruning strategy,index building,existing index structure,term-proximity support,efficient top-k computation,corresponding index pruning strategy,term proximity,indexation,web search engine,document structure | Monotonic function,Data mining,Search engine,Information retrieval,Ranking,Computer science,Document Structure Description,Ranking (information retrieval),Computation | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
14 | 0.61 | 23 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Mingjie Zhu | 1 | 89 | 4.32 |
Shuming Shi | 2 | 620 | 58.27 |
Mingjing Li | 3 | 3076 | 192.39 |
Ji-Rong Wen | 4 | 4431 | 265.98 |