Title | ||
---|---|---|
ALTO: an iterative area/performance tradeoff algorithm for LUT-based FPGA technology mapping |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we propose an iterative area/performance tradeoff algorithm for look-up table (LUT)-based field programmable gate array (FPGA) technology mapping. First, it finds an area-optimized, performance-considered initial network by a modified area optimization technique. Then, an iterative algorithm consisting of several resynthesizing techniques is applied to trade the area for the performance in the network gracefully. Experimental results show that this approach can efficiently provide a complete set of mapping solutions from the area-optimized one to the performance-optimized one for the given design. Furthermore, these two extreme solutions produced by our algorithm outperform the results provided by most existing algorithms. Therefore, our algorithm is very useful for the timing-driven, LUT-based FPGA synthesis. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2000 | 10.1109/92.863618 | IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
lut-based fpga synthesis,existing algorithm,mapping solution,complete set,modified area optimization technique,performance tradeoff algorithm,iterative algorithm,lut-based fpga technology mapping,performance-considered initial network,technology mapping,iterative area,propagation delay,critical path analysis,look up table,indexing terms,routing,field programmable gate array,logic circuits,algorithm design and analysis,iterative methods,critical path,field programmable gate arrays | Lookup table,Logic gate,Algorithm design,Propagation delay,Computer science,Iterative method,Circuit design,Field-programmable gate array,Algorithm,Electronic engineering,Critical path method | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
8 | 4 | 1063-8210 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.41 | 0 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Juinn-Dar Huang | 1 | 270 | 27.42 |
Jing-Yang Jou | 2 | 681 | 88.55 |
Wen-zen Shen | 3 | 99 | 13.96 |