Paper Info
Title
Human-Centered Computing: Thinking In and Out of the Box
Abstract
The motion picture "AI" lets the AI profession squirm in the glory of misrepresentation. It's not fun, especially when one's field suffers from waves of innovation/hype/backlash. The problem is that the film "AI" reinforces the dream of the android just when many who work toward "truly" intelligent technologies are cutting loose from the dream's more surrealistic aspects. People are asking new questions: Is the Turing test really the right kind of standard? If not, what is better? Must we define intelligence in reference to humans? Must intelligent technology be boxes chock-full of this thing we call intelligence, or should it operate as a "cognitive prosthesis" to amplify or extend human perceptual, cognitive and collaborative capabilities? Must intelligence always be in some individual thing - either a headbone or a box - or is intelligence a system property that is definable only in terms of the triple of humans-machines-contexts?.
Year
DOI
Venue
2001
10.1109/5254.956085
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Keywords
Field
DocType
turing test,cognitive prosthesis,boxes chock-full,intelligent technology,motion picture,new question,human perceptual,collaborative capability,human-centered computing,individual thing,ai profession squirm,cinematography,human factors,artificial intelligence,motion pictures
Symbolic artificial intelligence,Progress in artificial intelligence,Cognitive science,Human intelligence,Computer science,Knowledge management,Artificial general intelligence,Intelligence cycle (target-centric approach),Artificial intelligence, situated approach,Multimedia,Nouvelle AI,Applications of artificial intelligence
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
16
5
1541-1672
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
10
3.07
0
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Robert R. Hoffman1837133.72
Patrick J. Hayes21434237.65
Kenneth Ford324139.83