Title | ||
---|---|---|
Propositional Automata and Cell Automata: Representational Frameworks for Discrete Dynamic Systems |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper describes and compares two simple, powerful models for formalizing the behavior of discrete dynamic systems: Propositional and Cell Automata. Propositional Automata encode state in terms of boolean propositions, and behavior in terms of boolean gates and latches. Cell Automata generalize the propositional model by encoding state in terms of multi-valued cells, and behavior in terms of comparators and selectors that respond to cell values. While the models are equally expressive, Cell Automata are computationally more efficient than Propositional Automata. Additionally, arbitrary Propositional Automata can be converted to optimal Cell Automata with identical behavioral properties, and Cell Automata can be encoded as a Propositional Automata with only logarithmic increase in size. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1007/978-3-540-89378-3_6 | Australasian Conference on Artificial Intelligence |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
boolean gate,cell automata,propositional automata encode state,cell value,boolean proposition,arbitrary propositional automata,discrete dynamic system,propositional automata,representational frameworks,propositional model,discrete dynamic systems,encoding state | Discrete mathematics,Quantum finite automata,Automata theory,Continuous spatial automaton,Nested word,Mobile automaton,Automaton,Theoretical computer science,Propositional variable,Mathematics,ω-automaton | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
5360 | 0302-9743 | 6 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.86 | 7 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Eric Schkufza | 1 | 259 | 13.58 |
Nathaniel Love | 2 | 239 | 19.59 |
Michael R. Genesereth | 3 | 2447 | 830.52 |