Title | ||
---|---|---|
Benchmarking for research in power delivery networks of three-dimensional integrated circuits |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Power integrity is generally considered to be one of the major bottlenecks hindering the prevalence of three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D ICs). The higher integration density and smaller footprint result in significantly increased power density, which threatens the system reliability. In view of this, there has been groundswell of interest in academia to model, design or optimize the power delivery networks (PDNs) in 3D ICs. Unfortunately, while several PDN benchmarks exist for 2D PDNs, none is available in the context of 3D. As a consequence, most existing literature resorts to ad-hoc designs by artificially stacking 2D PDNs for experiments, rendering the results less convincing. In this paper, we put forward a set of ten PDN benchmarks that are extracted from industrial 3D designs. These designs are carefully selected such that they cover a wide range of functionality, size, TSV number, tier number and packaging style. We hope that the released benchmarks can facilitate and promote research in 3D PDNs. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1145/2451916.2451922 | ISPD |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
power integrity,ad-hoc design,power density,existing literature resort,tsv number,higher integration density,power delivery network,three-dimensional integrated circuit,pdn benchmarks,major bottleneck,tier number,benchmark | Mathematical optimization,Computer science,Simulation,Power integrity,Power density,Footprint,Rendering (computer graphics),Integrated circuit,Reliability engineering,Benchmarking,Stacking | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
7 | 0.69 | 15 |
Authors | ||
9 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Pei-Wen Luo | 1 | 74 | 8.22 |
Chun Zhang | 2 | 19 | 3.41 |
Yung-Tai Chang | 3 | 7 | 1.03 |
Liang-Chia Cheng | 4 | 37 | 6.46 |
Hung-Hsie Lee | 5 | 7 | 0.69 |
Bih-Lan Sheu | 6 | 8 | 1.04 |
Yu-Shih Su | 7 | 107 | 6.31 |
Ding-Ming Kwai | 8 | 521 | 46.85 |
Yiyu Shi | 9 | 553 | 83.22 |