Title
The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts.
Abstract
Abstract,A system,for,Banchored,discussion^ is compared,with,a system,for traditional forum discussion (Blackboard), and their collaborative and communica- tive affordances,for the collaborative,processing,of academic,texts are investigated. Results show,that discussion,in the system,for anchored,discussion,is more,directed at processing the meaning of texts than discussion in the traditional forum, which is more,oriented,towards,the,sharing,of personal,opinions,and,experiences.,This difference,in orientation,produces,a more,constructive,collaboration,in the system for anchored discussion, versus a more debate-like collaboration in the forum dis- cussion. Additionally, while messages in the traditional forum resemble usual dis- cussion or email conversation and contain social and regulative comments, discussion,in the system,for anchored,discussion,is seen,to be more,efficient and Bto-the-point.’’ We conclude that for collaborative text comprehension,by under- graduate students, anchored discussion might be more suitable than traditional forum discussion. Finally, the observed differences can be explained by the stronger defined collaborative context in the system for anchored discussion, which focuses participants_ collaborative,intentions,and,their frames,of reference. Keywords,CSCL . Anchored,discussion . Annotation,. Collaborative,literature
Year
DOI
Venue
2006
10.1007/s11412-006-9657-6
I. J. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Keywords
Field
DocType
discourse analysis,computer mediated communication,educational technology,cooperative learning,teaching methods,frame of reference,cooperation
Educational technology,Conversation,Communication,Computer science,Constructive,Knowledge management,Discourse analysis,Computer-mediated communication,Pedagogy,Cooperative learning,Affordance,Teaching method,Multimedia
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
1
3
1556-1615
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
42
3.42
18
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
J. van der Pol1856.60
Wilfried Admiraal229521.12
P. Robert-Jan Simons3806.46