Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Four dynamic element matching (DEM) algorithms are compared for a second-order and a fifth-order Δ-Σ ADC with the internal DAC realized with two different configurations. Simulations show that both SNDR and SFDR are significantly increased by using a DAC configuration that implements more unit elements. It is also found that with different oversampling ratios and architectures, the four algorithms behave differently in terms of the achieved overall SNDR and SFDR. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2002 | 10.1109/ISCAS.2002.1010548 | ISCAS (4) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
spurious free dynamic range,unit elements,sndr,low oversampling delta sigma adcs,oversampling ratios,sfdr,delta-sigma modulation,dynamic element matching,integrated circuit noise,signal to (noise + distortion) ratio,internal dac,digital simulation,circuit simulation,nonlinear distortion,neodymium,computational modeling,second order,linearity,delta sigma modulation | Flight dynamics (spacecraft),Oversampling,Control theory,Computer science,Linearity,Delta-sigma modulation,Electronic engineering,Spurious-free dynamic range,Sigma,Nonlinear distortion,Frequency conversion | Conference |
Volume | Citations | PageRank |
4 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
1 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Zhimin Li | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Terri S. Fiez | 2 | 167 | 47.25 |