Title | ||
---|---|---|
Joint video/depth bit allocation for 3D video coding based on distortion of synthesized view |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The joint coding of texture videos and depth maps plays a practical importance in three dimensional (3D) video system. Besides coding efficiency, the strategy of bit allocation between texture videos and depth maps is key issue. The paper firstly analyses the impacts on the quality of virtual views from the joint coding of texture videos and depth maps. Then the paper explores the relationship and establishes a quadratic model between texture video quantization step Qt and depth map quantization step Qd. Consequently, the paper proposes a joint bit allocation scheme based on the model to get the optimal quality of the synthesized views. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme has a better rate-distortion (RD) performance for the synthesized views, compared with fixed bits ratio between texture videos and depth maps, i. e. 5:1. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/BMSB.2012.6264319 | BMSB |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
coding efficiency,quadratic model,joint video-depth bit allocation scheme,3-d and multi-view video,rate control,three-dimensional video system,virtual view quality,quantisation (signal),depth map quantization step,3d video coding,video coding,synthesized view optimal quality,texture video quantization step,image texture,video/depth bit allocation,synthesized view distortion,rate-distortion performance,encoding,quantization | Computer vision,Texture compression,Algorithmic efficiency,Image texture,Computer science,Coding (social sciences),Artificial intelligence,Depth map,Quantization (signal processing),Distortion,Encoding (memory) | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
null | null | 2155-504 E-ISBN : 978-1-4673-0294-4 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4673-0294-4 | 4 | 0.47 |
References | Authors | |
6 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Gaofeng Zhu | 1 | 4 | 0.47 |
Gangyi Jiang | 2 | 865 | 105.98 |
Mei Yu | 3 | 542 | 86.20 |
Fucui Li | 4 | 30 | 3.89 |
Feng Shao | 5 | 603 | 72.75 |
Zongju Peng | 6 | 276 | 57.69 |