Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
A comparison of 3D shape retrieval methods based on a large-scale benchmark supporting multimodal queries |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Build a large-scale 3D shape retrieval benchmark that supports multi-modal queries.Evaluate the 26 3D shape retrieval methods using 3 types of metrics.Solicit and identify state-of-the-art methods and promising related techniques.Perform detailed analysis on diverse methods w.r.t accuracy and efficiency.Make benchmark and evaluation tools freely available to the community. Large-scale 3D shape retrieval has become an important research direction in content-based 3D shape retrieval. To promote this research area, two Shape Retrieval Contest (SHREC) tracks on large scale comprehensive and sketch-based 3D model retrieval have been organized by us in 2014. Both tracks were based on a unified large-scale benchmark that supports multimodal queries (3D models and sketches). This benchmark contains 13680 sketches and 8987 3D models, divided into 171 distinct classes. It was compiled to be a superset of existing benchmarks and presents a new challenge to retrieval methods as it comprises generic models as well as domain-specific model types. Twelve and six distinct 3D shape retrieval methods have competed with each other in these two contests, respectively. To measure and compare the performance of the participating and other promising Query-by-Model or Query-by-Sketch 3D shape retrieval methods and to solicit state-of-the-art approaches, we perform a more comprehensive comparison of twenty-six (eighteen originally participating algorithms and eight additional state-of-the-art or new) retrieval methods by evaluating them on the common benchmark. The benchmark, results, and evaluation tools are publicly available at our websites (http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/vug/sharp/contest/2014/Generic3D/, 2014, http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/vug/sharp/contest/2014/SBR/, 2014). |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1016/j.cviu.2014.10.006 | Computer Vision and Image Understanding |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
3D shape retrieval,Large-scale benchmark,Multimodal queries,Unified,Performance evaluation,Query-by-Model,Query-by-Sketch,SHREC | Subset and superset,Information retrieval,Computer science,CONTEST,Query by sketch,Sketch | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
131 | C | 1077-3142 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
41 | 1.14 | 105 |
Authors | ||
22 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bo Li | 1 | 257 | 15.09 |
| Yijuan Lu | 2 | 732 | 46.24 |
| Chunyuan Li | 3 | 467 | 33.86 |
| Afzal Godil | 4 | 619 | 30.70 |
| Tobias Schreck | 5 | 1854 | 123.28 |
| M. Aono | 6 | 643 | 60.79 |
| Martin Burtscher | 7 | 41 | 1.14 |
| Qiang Chen | 8 | 61 | 2.06 |
| Nihad Karim Chowdhury | 9 | 70 | 3.68 |
| Bin Fang | 10 | 61 | 2.06 |
| Hongbo Fu | 11 | 1167 | 73.64 |
| Takahiko Furuya | 12 | 411 | 21.02 |
| Haisheng Li | 13 | 70 | 2.90 |
| Jianzhuang Liu | 14 | 1614 | 98.72 |
| Henry Johan | 15 | 355 | 29.36 |
| Ryuichi Kosaka | 16 | 41 | 1.14 |
| Hitoshi Koyanagi | 17 | 41 | 1.14 |
| R. Ohbuchi | 18 | 1710 | 170.54 |
| A. Tatsuma | 19 | 185 | 10.86 |
| Yajuan Wan | 20 | 41 | 1.14 |
| Chaoli Zhang | 21 | 41 | 1.14 |
| Changqing Zou | 22 | 41 | 1.14 |