Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
3D models of humans are commonly used within computer graphics and vision, and so the ability to distinguish between body shapes is an important shape retrieval problem. We extend our recent paper which provided a benchmark for testing non-rigid 3D shape retrieval algorithms on 3D human models. This benchmark provided a far stricter challenge than previous shape benchmarks. We have added 145 new models for use as a separate training set, in order to standardise the training data used and provide a fairer comparison. We have also included experiments with the FAUST dataset of human scans. All participants of the previous benchmark study have taken part in the new tests reported here, many providing updated results using the new data. In addition, further participants have also taken part, and we provide extra analysis of the retrieval results. A total of 25 different shape retrieval methods are compared. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1007/s11263-016-0903-8 | International Journal of Computer Vision |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Benchmark,3D shape retrieval,Non-rigid 3D shape retrieval,3D humans | Journal | 120 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
2 | 0920-5691 | 3 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.40 | 37 | 28 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
David Pickup | 1 | 48 | 3.06 |
Xian-Fang Sun | 2 | 614 | 34.84 |
Paul L. Rosin | 3 | 2559 | 254.25 |
Ralph R. Martin | 4 | 3279 | 240.42 |
Zhi-Quan Cheng | 5 | 458 | 25.06 |
Zhou-hui Lian | 6 | 475 | 32.27 |
M. Aono | 7 | 643 | 60.79 |
Abdessamad Ben Hamza | 8 | 81 | 6.03 |
Alexander M. Bronstein | 9 | 2978 | 143.17 |
Michael M. Bronstein | 10 | 4032 | 167.52 |
S. Bu | 11 | 3 | 0.40 |
Umberto Castellani | 12 | 687 | 48.51 |
S. Cheng | 13 | 3 | 0.40 |
Valeria Garro | 14 | 46 | 5.24 |
Andrea Giachetti | 15 | 309 | 43.39 |
Afzal Godil | 16 | 619 | 30.70 |
Jiecai Han | 17 | 5 | 1.55 |
Henry Johan | 18 | 355 | 29.36 |
Laibin Zhang | 19 | 95 | 15.52 |
Bin Li | 20 | 924 | 94.55 |
Chunyuan Li | 21 | 467 | 33.86 |
Haisheng Li | 22 | 70 | 2.90 |
Roee Litman | 23 | 162 | 9.04 |
X. Liu | 24 | 3 | 0.40 |
Z. Liu | 25 | 3 | 0.40 |
Y. Lu | 26 | 3 | 0.40 |
A. Tatsuma | 27 | 185 | 10.86 |
J. Ye | 28 | 95 | 10.80 |