Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Modern operating systems must support a wide variety of services for a diverse set of users. Designers of these systems face a tradeoff between functionality and performance. Systems like Mach provide a set of general abstractions and attempt to handle every situation, which can lead to poor performance for common cases. Other systems, such as Unix, provide a small set of abstractions that can be made very efficient, at the expense of functionality. We are implementing a flexible system building tool, FLEX, that allows us to support a powerful operating systems interface efficiently by constructing specialized module implementations at runtime. FLEX improves the performance of existing systems by optimizing interprocess communications paths and relocating servers and clients to reduce communications overhead. These facilities improve the performance of Unix system calls on Mach from 20-400%. Furthermore, FLEX can dynamically extend the kernel in a controlled fashion, which gives user programs access to privileged data and devices not envisioned by the original operating system implementor |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1993 | 10.1109/WWOS.1993.348148 | Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
operating systems (computers),software tools,user interfaces,FLEX,Mach,Unix,abstractions,clients,communications overhead,flexible system building tool,flexible systems,interprocess communications,kernel,module implementations,operating systems,operating systems interface,servers | Kernel (linear algebra),Functional programming,Computer science,Server,Unix,FLEX,Implementation,Control system,User interface,Operating system | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
7 | 4.24 | 6 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
John B. Carter | 1 | 1785 | 162.82 |
Bryan Ford | 2 | 1573 | 149.56 |
Mike Hibler | 3 | 414 | 62.01 |
Ravindra Kuramkote | 4 | 154 | 14.86 |