Title
Comparisons Instead of Ratings: Towards More Stable Preferences
Abstract
More and more personalization systems are emerging to reduce the information overload of the Web. As a result, it has become vital to model users' preferences accurately. Our focus lies in the quality of users' expressed preferences, in terms of reliability and stability through time. Today, users are often brought to express their preferences through ratings on a multi-point scale. However, several studies have highlighted problems with ratings. We propose a new preference modality whereby users compare items two-by two ("I prefer x to y").This initial work on comparisons shows that users are in favor of this new preference mechanism and that comparisons are almost 20% more stable over time than those conveyed through ratings, thus more reliable. These encouraging findings let us think that comparisons may lead to a better user modeling and an increase in the quality of personalization services, such as recommender systems.
Year
DOI
Venue
2011
10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.13
WI-IAT), 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference
Keywords
Field
DocType
Internet,information management,personal information systems,Web information overload,multipoint scale,personalization system,preference mechanism,recommender system,user modeling,user preference,comparisons,personalization,preference expression,ratings,stability
Recommender system,Information management,Information overload,World Wide Web,Computer science,User modeling,Personalization,The Internet
Conference
Volume
ISBN
Citations 
1
978-0-7695-4513-4
19
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.99
10
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Nicolas Jones1190.99
Armelle Brun213821.49
Anne Boyer310618.08