Title | ||
---|---|---|
An experimental study on the role of compliant elements on the locomotion of the self-reconfigurable modular robots Roombots |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper presents the results of a study on the exploitation of compliance in structures made of self-reconfigurable modular robots - Roombots. This research was driven by the following three hypotheses: (1) compliance can improve locomotion performance; (2) different types of compliance will result in diverse locomotion behaviors; (3) control parameters optimized for a medium level of compliance will perform better for other values of compliance than parameters optimized for extremal compliance. Two types of in-series compliant elements were tested, with five different stiffness values for each of them, on a structure made of two Roombots modules. We ran dedicated on-line locomotion parameter optimizations for six different configurations and evaluated their performance for different stiffness values. Hypothesis 1 was confirmed for both types of compliant elements, with a peak of performance for an optimal level of compliance. The variety of locomotion strategies obtained for the different structures confirms hypothesis 2. Hypothesis 3 was only partially confirmed. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696974 | Intelligent Robots and Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
elasticity,mobile robots,motion control,multi-robot systems,optimisation,robot dynamics,compliant elements,dedicated on-line locomotion parameter optimizations,extremal compliance,in-series compliant elements,locomotion behaviors,locomotion performance,optimized control parameters,roombots,self-reconfigurable modular robot locomotion,stiffness values | Robot control,Motion control,Simulation,Stiffness,Computer science,Control engineering,Robot locomotion,Self-reconfiguring modular robot,Mobile robot | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
2153-0858 | 1 | 0.40 |
References | Authors | |
3 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Massimo Vespignani | 1 | 139 | 11.02 |
Senft, E. | 2 | 1 | 0.40 |
Bonardi, S. | 3 | 1 | 0.40 |
Moeckel, R. | 4 | 1 | 0.40 |