Title | ||
---|---|---|
Comparison of optimization strategy and similarity metric in atlas-to-subject registration using statistical deformation model |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
A robust atlas-to-subject registration using a statistical deformation model (SDM) is presented. The SDM uses statistics of voxel-wise displacement learned from pre-computed deformation vectors of a training dataset This allows an atlas instance to be directly translated into an intensity volume and compared with a patient's intensity volume. Rigid and nonrigid transformation parameters were simultaneously optimized via the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategy (CMA-ES), with image similarity used as the objective function. The algorithm was tested on CT volumes of the pelvis from 55 female subjects. A performance comparison of the CMA-ES and Nelder-Mead downhill simplex optimization algorithms with the mutual information and normalized cross correlation similarity metrics was conducted. Simulation studies using synthetic subjects were performed, as well as leave-one-out cross validation studies. Both studies suggested that mutual information and CMA-ES achieved the best performance. The leave-one-out test demonstrated 4.13 mm error with respect to the true displacement field, and 26,102 function evaluations in 180 seconds, on average. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1117/12.2081754 | Proceedings of SPIE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Statistical deformation model,atlas-to-subject registration,evolutionary optimization | Cross-correlation,Computer vision,Displacement field,Simplex algorithm,Computer science,Matrix (mathematics),Evolution strategy,Mutual information,CMA-ES,Artificial intelligence,Cross-validation | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
9415 | 0277-786X | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 9 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Yoshito Otake | 1 | 144 | 28.20 |
Ryan J. Murphy | 2 | 74 | 11.63 |
r b grupp | 3 | 3 | 3.47 |
yoichi sato | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
Russell H. Taylor | 5 | 1970 | 438.00 |
M Armand | 6 | 169 | 27.17 |