Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
BackgroundReproducibility is one of the tenets of the scientific method. Scientific experiments often comprise complex data flows, selection of adequate parameters, and analysis and visualization of intermediate and end results. Breaking down the complexity of such experiments into the joint collaboration of small, repeatable, well defined tasks, each with well defined inputs, parameters, and outputs, offers the immediate benefit of identifying bottlenecks, pinpoint sections which could benefit from parallelization, among others. Workflows rest upon the notion of splitting complex work into the joint effort of several manageable tasks.There are several engines that give users the ability to design and execute workflows. Each engine was created to address certain problems of a specific community, therefore each one has its advantages and shortcomings. Furthermore, not all features of all workflow engines are royalty-free —an aspect that could potentially drive away members of the scientific community. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1186/s12859-016-0978-9 | BMC Bioinformatics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Workflow, Interoperability, KNIME, Grid, Cloud, Galaxy, gUSE | Visualization,Computer science,Interoperability,Bioinformatics,Workflow engine,Workflow,Workflow management system,Grid,Scalability,Cloud computing | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
17 | 1 | 1471-2105 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.43 | 14 |
Authors | ||
8 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luis de la Garza | 1 | 17 | 4.13 |
| Johannes Veit | 2 | 5 | 0.43 |
| András Szolek | 3 | 15 | 1.73 |
| Marc Röttig | 4 | 25 | 2.99 |
| Stephan Aiche | 5 | 5 | 0.43 |
| Sandra Gesing | 6 | 121 | 25.55 |
| Knut Reinert | 7 | 1020 | 105.87 |
| Oliver Kohlbacher | 8 | 975 | 101.91 |