Title | ||
---|---|---|
18.3 A 1.2V 64Gb 8-channel 256GB/s HBM DRAM with peripheral-base-die architecture and small-swing technique on heavy load interface. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Because of the expansion of high performance computing (HPC) and server market, demand for HBM DRAM is increasing. With this market flow, diverse customers require various HBM product families. One customer requirement is full bandwidth with less density. Therefore, this work presents a HBM DRAM, which supports 4, 8, and even 2-hi stacks with full-bandwidth performance. The HBM DRAM adopts a peripheral base die architecture, which has smaller chip size and good testability resulting in more manufacturability. This architecture can compensate for process variation, since this problem among core dies within the same known good stacked die (KGSD) is the key issue of TSV-based stacked DRAM [1]. Layout aligning between PHY and TSVs improves the speed performance of the whole system due to reduced data skew. The peripheral base die contains address/command decoders (COMDEC), a core pipe-out (POUT) signal generator, and internal power, references and bias generators. A small-swing technique on a heavy load interface can reduce dynamic power and also has tolerance to process variations. |
Year | Venue | Field |
---|---|---|
2016 | ISSCC | Dram,Testability,Supercomputer,Computer science,Electronic engineering,Dynamic demand,Bandwidth (signal processing),Process variation,Skew,Design for manufacturability,Embedded system |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 2 | 0.47 |
References | Authors | |
2 | 22 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jong Chern Lee | 1 | 2 | 0.47 |
Jihwan Kim | 2 | 17 | 3.64 |
Kyung Whan Kim | 3 | 85 | 6.11 |
Young Jun Ku | 4 | 2 | 1.14 |
Dae Suk Kim | 5 | 2 | 0.80 |
Chun-Seok Jeong | 6 | 19 | 4.20 |
Tae Sik Yun | 7 | 2 | 1.14 |
Hong-Jung Kim | 8 | 21 | 3.70 |
Ho Sung Cho | 9 | 2 | 1.48 |
Yeon Ok Kim | 10 | 2 | 0.47 |
Jae Hwan Kim | 11 | 15 | 2.07 |
Jin-Ho Kim | 12 | 469 | 44.48 |
Sangmuk Oh | 13 | 2 | 1.48 |
Hyun Sung Lee | 14 | 2 | 0.80 |
ki hun kwon | 15 | 50 | 2.88 |
Dong Beom Lee | 16 | 2 | 0.80 |
Young Jae Choi | 17 | 2 | 0.80 |
Jeajin Lee | 18 | 2 | 0.47 |
Hyeon Gon Kim | 19 | 3 | 1.17 |
Jun Hyun Chun | 20 | 39 | 5.17 |
Jonghoon Oh | 21 | 4 | 1.87 |
Seok Hee Lee | 22 | 2 | 1.14 |