Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Retinal vessel segmentation plays a key role in the detection of numerous eye diseases, and its reliable computerised implementation becomes important for automatic retinal disease screening systems. A large number of retinal vessel segmentation algorithms have been reported, primarily based on three main steps including uniforming background, using the second-order Gaussian detector and applying binarization. These methods though improve the accuracy levels, their sensitivity to low-contrast in vessels still needs attention. In this paper, some contrast-sensitive approaches are discussed and embedded in the conventional algorithms, resulting in improved sensitivity for a given retinal vessel extraction technique. The proposed method gives good performance on both publicly databases with the accurate vessel extraction on STARE database. The proposed unsupervised method achieves the accuracy of 94.41%, much better than some existing unsupervised methods and comparable to some supervised methods. Its efficiency with different image conditions, together with its simplicity and fast operation, makes the blood vessel segmentation application suitable for retinal image computer analyses such as automated screening for early diabetic retinopathy detection. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1109/DICTA.2016.7797013 | 2016 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
retinal vessel extraction algorithm,retinal vessel segmentation,eye disease detection,Gaussian detector,binarization method,unsupervised method,blood vessel segmentation,retinal image computer analysis | Diabetic retinopathy,Computer vision,Vessel segmentation,Pattern recognition,Medical imaging,Extraction algorithm,Computer science,Retinal image,Gaussian,Artificial intelligence,Retinal,Detector | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-5090-2897-9 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
13 | 6 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toufique Ahmed Soomro | 1 | 26 | 6.45 |
| Mohammad A. Khan | 2 | 99 | 11.58 |
| Junbin Gao | 3 | 1112 | 119.67 |
| tariq khan | 4 | 50 | 7.73 |
| Manoranjan Paul | 5 | 372 | 86.59 |
| Nighat Mir | 6 | 9 | 2.39 |