Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
From the perspective of kinematics, dual-arm manipulation in robots differs from single-arm manipulation in that it requires high dexterity in a specific region of the manipulator's workspace. This feature has motivated research on the specialized design of manipulators for dual-arm robots. These recently introduced robots often utilize a shoulder structure with a tilted angle of some magnitude. The tilted shoulder yields better kinematic performance for dual-arm manipulation, such as a wider common workspace for each arm. However, this method tends to reduce total workspace volume, which results in lower kinematic performance for single-arm tasks in the outer region of the workspace. To overcome this trade-off, the authors of this study propose a design for a dual-arm robot with a biologically inspired four degree-of-freedom shoulder mechanism. This study analyzes the kinematic performance of the proposed design and compares it with that of a conventional dual-arm robot from the perspective of workspace and single-/dual-arm manipulability. The comparative analysis revealed that the proposed structure can significantly enhance single- and dual-arm kinematic performance in comparison with conventional dual-arm structures. This superior kinematic performance was verified through experiments, which showed that the proposed method required shorter settling time and trajectory-following performance than the conventional dual-arm robot. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1007/s11370-017-0215-z | Intelligent Service Robotics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Bimanual manipulation, Dual-arm manipulation, Dexterous manipulation, Redundant manipulator | Computer vision,Kinematics,Computer science,Simulation,Settling time,Workspace,Manipulator,Artificial intelligence,Robot,Dexterous manipulation,Mobile manipulator | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
10 | 2 | 1861-2784 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.47 | 10 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Dong-Hyuk Lee | 1 | 10 | 2.67 |
Hyeonjun Park | 2 | 18 | 3.66 |
Jae-Han Park | 3 | 31 | 8.60 |
Moonhong Baeg | 4 | 40 | 7.51 |
Ji-hun Bae | 5 | 134 | 19.83 |