Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Adaptive map interfaces have the potential of increasing usability by providing more task dependent and personalized support. It is unclear, however, how map adaptation must be designed to avoid a loss of control, transparency, and predictability. This article investigates the user experience of adaptive map interfaces in the context of gaze-based activity recognition. In a Wizard of Oz experiment we study two adaptive map interfaces differing in the degree of controllability and compare them to a non-adaptive map interface. Adaptive interfaces were found to cause higher user experience and lower perceived cognitive workload than the non-adaptive interface. Among the adaptive interfaces, users clearly preferred the condition with higher controllability. Results from structured interviews reveal that participants dislike being interrupted in their spatial cognitive processes by a sudden adaptation of the map content. Our results suggest that adaptive map interfaces should provide their users with control at what time an adaptation will be performed. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1007/s10707-016-0282-x | GeoInformatica |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Map adaptation,User experience,Activity recognition,Maps | Predictability,User experience design,Activity recognition,Controllability,Gaze,Computer science,Usability,Human–computer interaction,Wizard of Oz experiment,Cognition | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
21 | 3 | 1384-6175 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.38 | 42 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Peter Kiefer | 1 | 223 | 24.99 |
Ioannis Giannopoulos | 2 | 115 | 14.55 |
Vasileios Athanasios Anagnostopoulos | 3 | 3 | 0.73 |
Johannes Schöning | 4 | 1145 | 87.96 |
Martin Raubal | 5 | 1112 | 81.28 |