Title | ||
---|---|---|
Mainstream robotic toys and children with physical impairment: what about playfulness? |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Although play is recognized as the main drive for the child's physical, cognitive and social development, it is first of all a unique source of pleasure, fun and recreation. Playfulness, the individual intrinsic involvement in play has been described as a measurable characteristic of these aspects of play. Play and playfulness can be limited in children with physical impairment (PI) and robotic toys might offer good options and opportunities for playing. Five robotic toys of the mainstream market were proposed to seven children with PI to verify their playfulness and their usability. Playfulness was coded according to the Test of Playfulness (Bundy & Skard, 1997). Results show that all the robots were playful and interesting to the children; however, the role of the adult expert play companion proved crucial both as assistive agent and as a scaffolding partner, to assure a high level of playfulness to the play activity. A first discussion proposal of the results on the basis of the playfulness construct and of their constituent elements is presented, with the aim of laying the foundations for new reflections and deepening studies in the field of play and children with disabilities. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1145/3019943.3019974 | DSAI |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Serenella Besio | 1 | 0 | 0.68 |
Andrea Bonarini | 2 | 623 | 76.73 |
Helen Lynch | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
Paola Molina | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
Fabio Veronese | 5 | 2 | 2.07 |
Daniela Bulgarelli | 6 | 0 | 0.68 |