Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Deep Learning over Big Data (DLoBD) is becoming one of the most important research paradigms to mine value from the massive amount of gathered data. Many emerging deep learning frameworks start running over Big Data stacks, such as Hadoop and Spark. With the convergence of HPC, Big Data, and Deep Learning, these DLoBD stacks are taking advantage of RDMA and multi-/many-core based CPUs/GPUs. Even though a lot of activities are happening in the field, there is a lack of systematic studies on analyzing the impact of RDMA-capable networks and CPU/GPU on DLoBD stacks. To fill this gap, we propose a systematical characterization methodology and conduct extensive performance evaluations on three representative DLoBD stacks (i.e., CaffeOnSpark, TensorFlowOnSpark, and BigDL) to expose the interesting trends regarding performance, scalability, accuracy, and resource utilization. Our observations show that RDMA-based design for DLoBD stacks can achieve up to 2.7x speedup compared to the IPoIB based scheme. The RDMA scheme can also scale better and utilize resources more efficiently than the IPoIB scheme over InfiniBand clusters. For most cases, GPU-based deep learning can outperform CPU-based designs, but not always. We see that for LeNet on MNIST, CPU + MKL can achieve better performance than GPU and GPU + cuDNN on 16 nodes. Through our evaluation, we see that there are large rooms to improve the designs of current generation DLoBD stacks further. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1109/HOTI.2017.24 | 2017 IEEE 25th Annual Symposium on High-Performance Interconnects (HOTI) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Deep Learning,Big Data,DLoBD,InfiniBand,RDMA | MNIST database,Spark (mathematics),InfiniBand,Computer science,Parallel computing,Remote direct memory access,Artificial intelligence,Deep learning,Big data,Scalability,Speedup | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-5386-1014-5 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
13 | 5 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaoyi Lu | 1 | 602 | 60.53 |
| Haiyang Shi | 2 | 2 | 2.76 |
| M. Haseeb Javed | 3 | 2 | 1.73 |
| Rajarshi Biswas | 4 | 2 | 1.17 |
| Dhabaleswar K. Panda | 5 | 5366 | 446.70 |