Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Despite the growing body of literature on training in the responsible conduct of research, few studies have examined the effectiveness of delivery formats used in ethics courses (i.e., face-to-face, online, hybrid). The present effort sought to address this gap in the literature through a meta-analytic review of 66 empirical studies, representing 106 ethics courses and 10,069 participants. The frequency and effectiveness of 67 instructional and process-based content areas were also assessed for each delivery format. Process-based contents were best delivered face-to-face, whereas contents delivered online were most effective when restricted to compliance-based instructional contents. Overall, hybrid courses were found to be most effective, suggesting that ethics courses are best delivered using a blend of formats and content areas. Implications and recommendations for future development of ethics education courses in the sciences are discussed. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9869-3 | Science and Engineering Ethics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Blended learning,Delivery format,Ethics,Ethics education,Face-to-face,Hybrid,Online,Responsible conduct of research (RCR),Training | Sociology,Engineering ethics,Face-to-face,Blended learning,Empirical research | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
23 | 6 | 1353-3452 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 20 |
Authors | ||
7 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Michelle Todd | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Logan L. Watts | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Tyler J. Mulhearn | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Brett S. Torrence | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Megan R. Turner | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Shane Connelly | 6 | 51 | 10.99 |
| Michael D Mumford | 7 | 65 | 15.29 |