Title | ||
---|---|---|
A light-weight hardware/software co-design for pairing-based cryptography with low power and energy consumption |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Embedded electronic devices and sensors such as smartphones, smart watches, medical implants, and Wireless Sensor Nodes (WSN) are making the “Internet of Things” (IoT) a reality. Such devices often require cryptographic services such as authentication, integrity and non-repudiation, which are provided by Public-Key Cryptography (PKC). As these devices are severely resource-constrained, choosing a suitable cryptographic system is challenging. Pairing Based Cryptography (PBC) is among the best candidates to implement PKC in lightweight devices. In this research, we present a fast and energy efficient implementation of PBC based on Barreto-Naehrig (BN) curves and optimal Ate pairing using hardware/software co-design. Our solution consists of a hardware-based Montgomery multiplier, and pairing software running on an ARM Cortex A9 processor in a Zynq-7020 System-on-Chip (SoC). The multiplier is protected against simple power analysis (SPA) and differential power analysis (DPA), and can be instantiated with a variable number of processing elements (PE). Our solution improves performance (in terms of latency) over an open-source software PBC implementation by factors of 2.34 and 2.02, for 256- and 160-bit field sizes, respectively, as measured in the Zynq-7020 SoC. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1109/FPT.2017.8280149 | 2017 International Conference on Field Programmable Technology (ICFPT) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
ECC,pairing-based cryptography,Montgomery multiplier,hardware-software co-design,system-on-chip,embedded | Power analysis,ARM architecture,Pairing-based cryptography,Cryptography,Computer science,Field-programmable gate array,Real-time computing,Pairing,Software,Energy consumption,Embedded system | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-5386-2657-3 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Ahmad Salman | 1 | 1 | 0.68 |
William Diehl | 2 | 14 | 3.67 |
Jens-Peter Kaps | 3 | 430 | 37.83 |