Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This note uncovers a design tension in participatory design practice in the context of two organizations in Nepal working on reducing sex-trafficking and helping survivors. The dilemma consists of contradictions between the public face that the organizations present to the world and the more complex underlying picture painted by survivors. In initial work, we created and deployed a value-elicitation game for survivors that gave us better access to their voices. However, the implications for ongoing participatory work remain to be unpacked. The veneer may constitute a necessary part of the staffsu0027 successful interactions with external funders. The survivors rely on the resources that the organization gathers, yet the veneer may also obscure some aspects of the survivorsu0027 needs. The question raised is how should our PD practice position itself with respect to the ideal of comprehensive democratic participation when potential harm may ensue to vulnerable people? |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2018 | PDC | Population,Participatory design,Public relations,Harm,Knowledge management,Dilemma,Citizen journalism,Engineering,Democracy |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 1 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
11 | 5 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aakash Gautam | 1 | 3 | 3.80 |
| Chandani Shrestha | 2 | 1 | 1.36 |
| Andrew Kulak | 3 | 1 | 0.34 |
| Steve Harrison | 4 | 1451 | 346.07 |
| Deborah G. Tatar | 5 | 509 | 179.65 |