Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Trade-offs between the SIMD and MIMD models of architecture for parallelism are presented. Mixed-mode parallelism, where a machine can switch between the SIMD and MIMD modes of parallelism at instruction-level granularity with generally negligible overhead, is discussed. Advantages and disadvantages of mixed-mode parallelism and an example of a mixed-mode parallel algorithm are given. The relationship of mixed-mode processing to high-performance heterogeneous computing is overviewed. Difficulties involved with evaluating interconnection networks for parallel machines are then considered. There are a myriad of metrics that have been used in the literature. The problems involved with choosing the most appropriate metric or weighted set of metrics, and performing “fair” comparisons, are explored |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1994 | 10.1109/ISPAN.1994.367171 | ISPAN |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
multiprocessor interconnection networks,parallel algorithms,parallel architectures,mimd architecture,simd architecture,fair comparisons,high-performance heterogeneous computing,instruction-level granularity,interconnection network evaluation,mixed-mode computing,mixed-mode parallelism,multiple instruction stream,multiple data stream machines,negligible overhead,parallel architecture,parallel machines,single instruction stream,weighted set of metrics,parallel processing,computer architecture,computer networks,parallel algorithm,switches,concurrent computing,broadcasting,heterogeneous computing | Instruction-level parallelism,Implicit parallelism,Computer science,Parallel algorithm,Task parallelism,Parallel computing,SIMD,Data parallelism,Concurrent computing,MIMD | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
0-8186-6507-6 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
17 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Howard Jay Siegel | 1 | 5428 | 689.33 |
John K. Antonio | 2 | 44 | 6.32 |