Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
A random deployment of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is often the basic structure used in the context of fire forest detection, military applications or any situation where the zone-of-interest is not accessible by humans. The main problematic in this kind of deployment is the formation of gaps or voids, which represent a zone which is not covered in the network. This reduces significantly its Quality of Service and can lead to serious problems, like a non-detected starting fire, the presence of unexpected persons or attacks, etc. Therefore, detecting zones that are not covered by the WSN is of great importance. In this paper, we present a new method allowing to detect gaps and voids in WSNs or in IoT networks by using some characteristics of the angles of the polygon formed by the boundary as determined by the D-LPCN algorithm. These angles can be interior or exterior. Characterizing the angles of the polygon formed by these boundary nodes allows to specify whether this boundary is a gap or a void, in case where the obtained polygon is interior. Since D-LPCN is fault-tolerant, the simulation results show that it is possible to use it for the detection of faulty nodes and intrusions.(1) |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1145/3231053.3231089 | ICFNDS'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE NETWORKS AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Wireless Sensor Network, IoT, gap, void, distributed algorithms, polygons, interior and exterior angles, security, D-LPCN | Polygon,Software deployment,Fire forest,Computer science,Internet of Things,Quality of service,Distributed algorithm,Void (astronomy),Wireless sensor network,Distributed computing | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 9 |
Authors | ||
7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Madani Bezoui | 1 | 8 | 3.56 |
Ahcène Bounceur | 2 | 306 | 35.05 |
Loïc Lagadec | 3 | 62 | 12.84 |
Reinhardt Euler | 4 | 95 | 28.50 |
Mohammad Hammoudeh | 5 | 225 | 36.88 |
Abdelkader Laouid | 6 | 22 | 4.52 |
Abdelkamel Tari | 7 | 70 | 24.81 |