Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This research aims at identifying if current code validation tools contemplate the requirements of a guideline for the development of accessible mobile applications, called GUAMA, which was specified by our team over 3 years of research with visually impaired individuals and whose final conception process is formalized in this paper. Then, several tools were analyzed and two of them were chosen for a deeper study: Lint and Espresso. The results showed that Lint and Espresso respectively contemplate 12 and 6 from the 48 GUAMA requirements. Thus, the unique use of such tools is not adequate to validate the range of requirements. These results have motivated the investigation of a new integrated service/process, which presents a higher coverage regarding the validation of accessibility requirements. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1145/3266237.3266238 | SBES'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE XXXII BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Accessibility,Requirements validation,Automation tools | Espresso,Requirements validation,Systems engineering,Computer science,Code Validation | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 1 |
Authors | ||
9 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clauirton A. Siebra | 1 | 16 | 4.44 |
| Walter Correia | 2 | 24 | 11.31 |
| Marcelo Penha | 3 | 16 | 3.80 |
| Jefte Macedo | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Jonysberg P. Quintino | 5 | 0 | 6.76 |
| Marcelo Anjos | 6 | 0 | 0.68 |
| Fabiana Florentin | 7 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Fabio Q. B. da Silva | 8 | 515 | 53.57 |
| André L. M. Santos | 9 | 229 | 20.15 |