Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Examining the Effect of a Game-like Practice Tool on the Quality of Student Peer Evaluations. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This work-in-progress research-to-practice analysis examines whether using a more game-like practice tool for learning a peer rating schema significantly improves the quality of peer evaluations in a team-based course. Peer evaluations in our study are defined as the peer evaluations of teamwork behavior as measured by the CATME peer evaluation system. Data samples in this study include students in teams from introduction to engineering courses in a large Midwest university's engineering program who used the previous version and the current more game-like version of the rater practice tool. We found significant differences in the mean ratings of our intervention group and in the distribution of variances versus our control group in the first peer evaluation of the semester. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659270 | Frontiers in Education Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
teamwork,peer ratings | Medical education,Teamwork,Peer evaluation,Engineering program,Sociology,Engineering education,Knowledge management,Schema (psychology) | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
0190-5848 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 4 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| daniel ferguson | 1 | 2 | 3.39 |
| Elizabeth Shu | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
| cao | 3 | 3 | 4.27 |
| Matthew W. Ohland | 4 | 14 | 10.26 |