Paper Info
Title
Second-chance Testing Course Policies and Student Behavior
Abstract
In this research category full paper, we present our findings on the effects of different course policies for second chance testing on students' studying and exam taking behavior. Second-chance testing, where students are allowed to take a second instance of an exam for some form of grade replacement, is a less expensive approximation of mastery-based learning that can be easily integrated into a broad range of college course structures. It encourages students to review course material after poor performance on an examination but limits the amount of resources instructors must invest in the creation of examinations or in grading them. There exists, however, a large space of potential course policies for integrating second-chance testing into a course and little prior research on how these policies affect student behavior. This paper analyzes three different grading policies in use at Midwestern University. All of the policies attempt to encourage students to prepare adequately for the first-chance exam and review the material again before the second-chance exam, if they elect to take it. The first policy used a partial grade replacement policy with insurance: students' grades could only improve by taking the second-chance exam but the first-chance exam always counts for at least one-third of a students' grade on the examination. The second policy is identical, but required students to complete a zero-credit, online-homework assignment before being allowed to take the second-chance exam. The third policy implemented full grade replacement (even if the second score is lower) and capped the score that could be achieved on the second exam. By comparing these different course policies, we show that grading policies have a significant effect on whether students take second-chance exams. We also performed a quasi-experimental study, adding second chance exams to a course. We present data from students' exam performance and from the course's learning management system that suggest that adding a second-chance exam had no effect on student performance or study habits for the first-chance exam. However, the total amount of time that students studied did increase substantially as students who took the second-chance exam studied an additional 60% of their original effort.
Year
DOI
Venue
2019
10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028490
Frontiers in Education Conference
Keywords
DocType
ISSN
second-chance testing,assessment,STEM,higher education
Conference
0190-5848
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
0
0.34
0
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Geoffrey L. Herman112325.37
Kavya Varghese200.34
Craig B. Zilles393294.74