Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Single Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: A Real-World Dataset, Subjective Studies, and an Objective Metric |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Numerous single image super-resolution (SISR) algorithms have been proposed during the past years to reconstruct a high-resolution (HR) image from its low-resolution (LR) observation. However, how to fairly compare the performance of different SISR algorithms/results remains a challenging problem. So far, the lack of comprehensive human subjective study on large-scale real-world SISR datasets and accurate objective SISR quality assessment metrics makes it unreliable to truly understand the performance of different SISR algorithms. We in this paper make efforts to tackle these two issues. Firstly, we construct a real-world SISR quality dataset (i.e., RealSRQ) and conduct human subjective studies to compare the performance of the representative SISR algorithms. Secondly, we propose a new objective metric, i.e., KLTSRQA, based on the Karhunen-Loeve Transform (KLT) to evaluate the quality of SISR images in a no-reference (NR) manner. Experiments on our constructed RealSRQ and the latest synthetic SISR quality dataset (i.e., QADS) have demonstrated the superiority of our proposed KLTSRQA metric, achieving higher consistency with human subjective scores than relevant existing NR image quality assessment (NR-IQA) metrics. The dataset and the code will be made available at https://github.com/Zhentao-Liu/RealSRQ-KLTSRQA. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2022 | 10.1109/TIP.2022.3154588 | IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Measurement, Degradation, Cameras, Superresolution, Quality assessment, Image segmentation, Computer science, Single image super-resolution, real-world, image quality assessment, no-reference metric, Karhunen-Loeve transform | Journal | 31 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
1 | 1057-7149 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 44 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wei Zhou | 1 | 193 | 28.72 |
| Zhentao Liu | 2 | 0 | 0.68 |
| Ke Gu | 3 | 1321 | 77.21 |
| Feng Shao | 4 | 603 | 72.75 |
| Zhang X | 5 | 250 | 34.16 |
| Hantao Liu | 6 | 328 | 27.86 |
| Weisi Lin | 7 | 5366 | 280.14 |