Investigating The Potential Of A Gist-Sensitive Computer-Aided Detection Tool | 0 | 0.34 | 2020 |
Effect Of Time Of Day On Radiology Image Interpretations | 0 | 0.34 | 2020 |
Computer-Assisted Nuclear Atypia Scoring of Breast Cancer: a Preliminary Study. | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study. | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
Comparing senior residents performance to radiologists in lung cancer detection. | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
Estimating latent reader-performance variability using the Obuchowski-Rockette method. | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
Does the strength of the gist signal predict the difficulty of breast cancer detection in usual presentation and reporting mechanisms? | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
BI-RADS density categorization using deep neural networks. | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
A deep (learning) dive into visual search behaviour of breast radiologists. | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
Knowledge and practice of computed tomography exposure parameters amongst radiographers in Jordan. | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement. | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
Detection Of The Abnormal Gist In The Prior Mammograms Even With No Overt Sign Of Breast Cancer | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
High-Resolution X-ray Phase-Contrast 3D Imaging of Breast Tissue Specimens as a Possible Adjunct to Histopathology. | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
Characteristics of the group of radiologists that benefits the most using Breast Screen Reader Assessment Strategy (BREAST). | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
A Framework For Distinguishing Benign From Malignant Breast Histopathological Images Using Deep Residual Networks | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
Towards Clinic-Friendly Solutions For Patient Trials In Breast Cancer Phase Contrast Imaging | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
Does Expectation of Abnormality Affect the Search Pattern of Radiologists When Looking for Pulmonary Nodules? | 1 | 0.35 | 2017 |
Determining local and contextual features describing appearance of difficult to identify mitotic figures. | 0 | 0.34 | 2017 |
Predicting radiologists' true and false positive decisions in reading mammograms by using gaze parameters and image-based features. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
Breast Asymmetry, Distortion and Density Are Key Factors for False Positive Decisions. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
A Pilot Study on Radiation Dose from Combined Mammography Screening in Australia. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
The classification of normal screening mammograms. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
Lower Recall Rates Reduced Readers' Sensitivity in Screening Mammography. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
Quantra reproduces BI-RADS assessment on a two-point scale. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
The impact of radiology expertise upon the localization of subtle pulmonary lesions. | 1 | 0.34 | 2016 |
Investigating the link between the radiological experience and the allocation of an 'equivocal finding'. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
The effectiveness of the cranio-caudal mammogram projection among radiologists. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
Varying performance in mammographic interpretation across two countries: Do results indicate reader or population variances? | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
An Investigation into the Consistency in Mammographic Density Identification by Radiologists: Effect of Radiologist Expertise and Mammographic Appearance | 0 | 0.34 | 2015 |
BREAST: A Novel Strategy to Improve the Detection of Breast Cancer. | 0 | 0.34 | 2014 |
Mammographic Density Effect on Readers' Performance and Visual Search Pattern. | 0 | 0.34 | 2014 |
Mammography: Radiologist and Image Characteristics That Determine the Accuracy of Breast Cancer Diagnosis. | 0 | 0.34 | 2014 |
Understanding the Role of Correct Lesion Assessment in Radiologists' Reporting of Breast Cancer. | 0 | 0.34 | 2014 |
Optimization of Computed Tomography Protocols: Limitations of a Methodology Employing a Phantom with Location-Known Opacities. | 0 | 0.34 | 2013 |
Trend of Contrast Detection Threshold with and without Localization. | 0 | 0.34 | 2013 |
Breast Screen New South Wales Generally Demonstrates Good Radiologic Viewing Conditions. | 0 | 0.34 | 2013 |
Verification of DICOM GSDF in Complex Backgrounds. | 2 | 0.52 | 2012 |