Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Probes have been adopted with great enthusiasm in both Design and HCI. The heterogeneity with which they have been used in practice reflects how the method has proved elusive for many. Originators and commentators of probes have discussed misinterpretations of the method, highlighting the lack of accounts that describe in detail the design of probes and their use with participants. This paper discusses our particular use of Design Probes as directed craft objects that are both tools for design and tools for exploration across a number of projects, spanning a decade, centered on self-identity and personal significance. In offering an example of what a framework for probe design and use might look like, we attempt to address the identified lacuna, providing a synthetic account of probe design and use over an extended period and conceptualizing the relationship between the properties of probes and their use in design projects. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1145/2470654.2466473 | CHI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
design project,synthetic account,great enthusiasm,extended period,particular use,craft object,probe design,personal significance,design probes work,materiality,design,reciprocity,trust,investment,interaction design | Empathy,Craft,Interaction design,Enthusiasm,Computer science,Human–computer interaction,Reciprocity (social psychology),Materiality (auditing) | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
20 | 1.37 | 9 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jayne Wallace | 1 | 440 | 34.58 |
| J McCarthy | 2 | 745 | 72.26 |
| Peter Wright | 3 | 1645 | 203.56 |
| Patrick Olivier | 4 | 40 | 2.90 |