Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Future teleconferencing may enhance communication between remote people by supporting non-verbal communication within an unconstrained space where people can move around and share the manipulation of artefacts. By linking walk-in displays with a Collaborative Virtual Environment (CVE) platform we are able to physically situate a distributed team in a spatially organised social and information context. We have found this to demonstrate unprecedented naturalness in the use of space and body during non-verbal communication and interaction with objects.However, relatively little is known about how people interact through this technology, especially while sharing the manipulation of objects. We observed people engaged in such a task while geographically separated across national boundaries. Our analysis is organised into collaborative scenarios, that each requires a distinct balance of social human communication with consistent shared manipulation of objects.Observational results suggest that walk-in displays do not suffer from some of the important drawbacks of other displays. Previous trials have shown that supporting natural non-verbal communication, along with responsive and consistent shared object manipulation, is hard to achieve. To better understand this problem, we take a close look at how the scenario impacts on the characteristics of event traffic. We conclude by suggesting how various strategies might reduce the consistency problem for particular scenarios. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2004 | 10.1145/1077534.1077550 | VRST |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
cve,human interaction,non verbal communication | Consistency control,Teleconference,Simulation,Computer science,Shared object,Naturalness,Human interaction,Human–computer interaction,Collaborative virtual environment,Human communication | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
1-58113-907-1 | 11 | 0.86 |
References | Authors | |
18 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
David J. Roberts | 1 | 180 | 18.66 |
Robin Wolff | 2 | 204 | 13.95 |
Oliver Otto | 3 | 100 | 7.51 |
Dieter Kranzlmüller | 4 | 36 | 3.53 |
Christoph Anthes | 5 | 72 | 11.85 |
Anthony Steed | 6 | 3502 | 353.97 |