Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Data-driven dynamic logic (D3L) is very efficient when low-power constraints are mandatory. Unfortunately, this advantage is typically obtained at the expense of speed performances. This paper presents a novel technique to realize D3L parallel prefix tree adders without significantly compromising speed performance. When applied to a 64-bit Kogge-Stone adder realized with 90-nm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology, the proposed technique leads to an energy-delay product that is 29% and 21% lower than its standard domino logic and conventional D3L counterparts, respectively. It also shows a worst case delay that is 10% lower than that of the D3L approach and only 5% higher than that of the conventional domino logic. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/TCSII.2008.2010187 | IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
adders,proposed technique,speed performance,conventional domino logic,data-driven dynamic logic (d3l),novel technique,parallel prefix adder,high-speed adders,low-power electronics,d3l parallel prefix tree,64-bit kogge-stone adder,d3l approach,standard domino logic,cmos technology,kogge-stone adders,high-speed adder,cmos logic circuits,logic design,power-constrained environment,parallel prefix tree adders,size 90 nm,data-precharged dynamic logic,energy-delay product,low-power constraints,data-driven dynamic logic,d3l counterpart,word length 64 bit,clock-precharged dynamic logic,complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor,circuit topology,power dissipation,tree data structures,energy dissipation,dynamic logic,complementary metal oxide semiconductor,low power electronics | Domino logic,Logic synthesis,Adder,Computer science,Tree (data structure),Electronic engineering,CMOS,Dynamic logic (digital electronics),Topology (electrical circuits),Low-power electronics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
56 | 2 | 1549-7747 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
10 | 0.77 | 9 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Fabio Frustaci | 1 | 129 | 17.55 |
Marco Lanuzza | 2 | 203 | 28.64 |
Paolo Zicari | 3 | 54 | 5.82 |
Stefania Perri | 4 | 264 | 33.11 |
Pasquale Corsonello | 5 | 278 | 38.06 |