Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
For their usage in the semantic web valid ontologies are required for a given domain. Here we focus on ontologies represented as concept maps. We outline two methodological approaches for empirically validating concept maps. One procedure is to validate a given concept map with concept maps generated systematically by others. As a second method of validating a given concept map, we suggest to observe the behaviour in a relevant situational context as a validation criterion. In this scope, a method for predicting personsý problem solving behaviour by using a given concept map is outlined. In general, the purpose and ultimate use of a given concept map has to be taken into consideration for choosing a validation procedure and interpreting its results. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2005 | 10.1109/ICALT.2005.135 | ICALT |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
concept maps,methodological approach,validation criterion,valid ontology,ultimate use,preliminary methodological considerations,empirical validation,relevant situational context,validation procedure,semantic web,concept map,psychology,cognitive science,electronic learning,context modeling,ontologies | Ontology (information science),Concept map,Computer aided instruction,Semantic search,Meaning (linguistics),Computer science,Knowledge management,Semantic Web,Semantic analytics,Natural language processing,Artificial intelligence,Social Semantic Web | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
0-7695-2338-2 | 7 | 1.06 |
References | Authors | |
6 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Dietrich Albert | 1 | 430 | 63.65 |
Christina M. Steiner | 2 | 83 | 14.93 |