Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
To advance robotic science it is important to perform experiments that can be replicated by other researchers to compare different methods. However, these comparisons tend to be biased, since re-implementations of reference methods often lack thoroughness and do not include the hands-on experience obtained during the original development process. This paper presents a thorough comparison of 3D scan registration algorithms based on a 3D mapping field experiment, carried out by two research groups that are leading in the field of 3D robotic mapping. The iterative closest points algorithm (ICP) is compared to the normal distributions transform (NDT). We also present an improved version of NDT with a substantially larger valley of convergence than previously published versions. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152538 | ICRA |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
normal distribution,normal distributions transform,mapping field experiment,iterative closest points algorithm,robotic science,original development process,mobile robots,3d scan registration,3d robotic mapping,larger valley,improved version,robotic mapping,different method,hands-on experience,transforms,image registration,iterative methods,robot vision,registration reliability,interpolation,robots,probability density function,algorithm design and analysis,convergence,accuracy,computer science,gaussian distribution | Convergence (routing),Data mining,Normal distribution,Computer science,Interpolation,Nondestructive testing,Control engineering,Artificial intelligence,Computer vision,Iterative method,Robotic mapping,Robot,Image registration | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
2009 | 1 | 1050-4729 E-ISBN : 978-1-4244-2789-5 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4244-2789-5 | 55 | 1.94 |
References | Authors | |
7 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Martin Magnusson | 1 | 287 | 12.86 |
Andreas Nüchter | 2 | 1341 | 90.03 |
Christopher Lörken | 3 | 64 | 3.65 |
Achim J. Lilienthal | 4 | 1468 | 113.18 |
Joachim Hertzberg | 5 | 1571 | 142.29 |